IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
API Crop Science Ltd. (M/s) & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M No. 11244 of 2020
Decided On : 16-09-2024
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Amarjot Bhatti, J.:- Petitioners M/s API Crop Science Limited through its Regional Manager Hanuman Dutt and Hanuman Dutt in his personal capacity as Regional Manager filed petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of complaint No. COMA-153 of 2019 dated 25.11.2019 titled “State of Punjab through Chief Agriculture Officer, Ferozepur vs. M/s Sidhu Pesticide and others”, under Section 19 (a) (c) (v) of Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with Section 12 AA of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (Annexure P-1) pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur and summoning order dated 25.11.2019 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur vide which petitioners along with co-accused have been summoned under Section 19 (a) (c) (v) of Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with Section 12 AA of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (Annexure P-2) and further to stay the proceedings qua petitioners pending in aforesaid Court.
2. Brief facts of the case are State of Punjab through Chief Agriculture Officer, Ferozepur filed complaint under Section 19 (a) (c) (v) of Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with Section 12 AA of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 against M/s Sidhu Pesticide, Kamal Wala Road, Mallanwala through its proprietor Balkar Singh and others in which petitioners are arrayed as accused No. 5 and 6. On 04.03.2013, Balwinder Singh, Fertilizer Inspector, Block Makhu visited the shop of M/s Sidhu Pesticide Kamal Wala Road, Mallanwala, District Ferozepur under the powers vested vide Clause 28 of Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and inspected the premises. Balkar Singh, Proprietor of said firm was present at that time. After disclosing his (Fertilizer Inspector) identity, he intimated his desire to draw sample of Azospirillium Spp. (5x107CFU/gm), manufactured by M/s Antecedent Pabulum Inc and marketed by M/s API Crop Science Limited. He checked record and found 60 packets i.e. 3.5 Kg packet each bearing Batch No. GA- 07, date of manufacturing 02.12.2012 of Azospirillium Spp. in stock as per stock register of the firm. These packets were machine stitched. He prepared three Form J-1 and Balkar Singh, Proprietor signed these forms in token of drawing sample. Balwinder Singh prepared five Form P, three Form K1. He tried to associate some customer as a witness but nobody was willing to join. Fertilizer Inspector selected three sealed packets randomly from stock of 60 packets, according to Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985. Samples were drawn by Fertilizer Inspector by taking original sealed packets as such and same were put in cloth bags and three Form P were also kept along with cloth bags and mouths of these cloth bags were tied with a strong twine separately to keep fertilizer sample packets airtight and same were sealed with letter F.1(4)ZIRA. One sealed sample and one Form J-1 was handed to Balkar Singh, Proprietor at the spot and other portions of sample along with Form J-1, Form K-1 and Form-P were deposited in the office of Chief Agriculture Officer by said Fertilizer Inspector, Block Makhu on 05.03.2013 vide letter No. 20 dated 05.03.2013, duly signed by Fertilizer Inspector and in the office of CAO, Ranbir Singh ADO (Enf.) received samples and retained under his possession and gave receipt to Balwinder Singh. CAO Paramjit Singh Sandhu sent one sample with other samples to Biofertilizer Testing Laboratory, Regional Centre of Organic Farming, Hisar, Haryana vide letter No. 1547 dated 06.03.2013 with Form K-1 through Rajinder Kumar, ASI, Ferozepur against proper receipt. Expert analyzed the samples and declared it sub-standard as only 3.0 x 106 Viable Cell Count was found instead of 5 x 107/gm (minimum). Copies of these reports were served upon dealer/proprietor, manufacturer and marketing company along with show cause notices through registe
Liability for sub-standard fertilizer lies with the manufacturer, not the marketing company, especially when samples are taken from sealed packets.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of the sampling procedure as prescribed in Schedule II of the Fertiliser (Control) Order, 198....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of detailed documentation of the procedure followed in drawing samples of fertilizers to ensure compliance with the law and maintain....
the absence of any material to show that petitioner is responsible for the quality of fertilizers seized, the proceedings now initiated against the petitioner is nothing but an abuse of process of la....
The cancellation of a Letter of Authorization under the Fertilizer Control Order requires substantiated evidence, and disregarding laboratory test results violates procedural fairness and relevant le....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.