PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
M/s Tata Chemicals Limited And Another - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M-4601-2019 (O&M)
Decided On : 07-05-2024
JUDGMENT :
Jas Jit Singh Bedi, J.
The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.PC. is for quashing of the Complaint Case No.COMA/7206 of 2018 dated 19.05.2018 (Annexure P-3) titled as 'State through Chief Agricultural Officer, Ludhiana Vs. M/s Guliani Fertilizers and others'' registered under Clause 19 of the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 read with Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, the summoning order dated 22.05.2018 (Annexure P-4) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. The brief facts of the case are that Gurinder Singh, Agriculture Development Officer-cum-Notified Fertilizer Inspector Machhiwara along with Manjit Singh, Agriculture Officer, Machhiwara on 30.05.2016 in the presence of Sh. Parvinder Singh, Proprietor of M/s Guliani Fertilizer Rahon Road, Macchiwara, Ludhiana checked the fertilizer stock of the firm and found that 5 kgs x 116 bags (580 Kgs) of Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate 33% was lying in balance in the said premises on 30.05.2016. The samples of the same were taken for the purposes of a quality check. The same were sent for analysis and as per the report of the Analytical Chemist, Incharge, State Notified Fertilizer Quality Control Laboratory, Faridkot, the first sample test result dated 16.06.2016 showed Zinc contents to be 27.18% as against 33% and thus, the analysis report showed that the sample was not according to the specifications and had failed in Zinc contents. A show cause notice dated 04.07.2016 was served by the Chief Agriculture Officer, Ludhiana to M/s Guliani Fertilizer Rahon Road, Macchiwara, Ludhiana and to its proprietor for violation of Clause 19 of the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 and a copy of the analysis report was also supplied. Show cause notices were also sent to the manufacturing company i.e. M/s Chakradhar Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. E-3, UPSIDC, Industrial Area Begarjpur Muzaffamagar and marketing company M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Mumbai Regd. Office SCO 121-122-123, Sector 34A, Chandigarh and replies were submitted by M/s Guliani Fertilizer Rahon Road, Macchiwara, Ludhiana, M/s Chakradhar Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. E-3, UPSIDC, Industrial Area Begarjpur Muzaffamagar and M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Mumbai Regd. Office SCO 121-122-123, Sector 34A, Chandigarh. The Chief Agriculture Officer, Ludhiana also called upon the dealer, manufacturing company and marketing company to appear personally and to explain the matter regarding failure of the sample. The dealer availed the opportunity for re-analysis of the sample provided to him under Clause 32-A(2) of Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985. The Joint Director of Agriculture (Input) Mohali, Punjab "Appellate Authority" called both the sample portion one from the office and one from the dealer firm and sent one sealed test sample portion to the Thiruvananthapuram Laboratoiy on 05.10.2016 which was sent back with remark "Laboratoiy was not having the chemical for reanalysis". The sample was again sent to the Incharge, Regional Fertilizer Quality Control Laboratory, Bardoli, District Surat on 05.10.2016. The sample result showed Zinc Sulphate contents 31.47% as against the 33%. Thus, the sample had been found to be not according to specifications. The Joint Director of Agriculture (Input) Mohali, Punjab (then the Agricultural Officer, Ludhiana) Paramjit Singh Brar served a show cause notice to the retailer/dealer firm M/s Guliani Fertilizer Rahon Road, Macchiwara, Ludhiana dated 15.05.2017 for violation of clause 19 of Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985. The Show Cause Notice was also sent to the wholesale distributor firm M/s Sandeep Fertilizer sales corporation, Shop-77 New Grain Market, Khanna, Ludhiana, manufacturing company M/s Chakradhar Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. E-3, UPSIDC, Industrial Area Begarjpur Muzaffamagar and marketing company M/s Tata Chemicals Limited, Mumbai Regd. Office SCO 121-122-123, Sector 34A, Chandigarh (Petitioner) dated 19.05.201
Liability for sub-standard fertilizer lies with the manufacturer, not the marketing company, especially when samples are taken from sealed packets.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of the sampling procedure as prescribed in Schedule II of the Fertiliser (Control) Order, 198....
The cancellation of a Letter of Authorization under the Fertilizer Control Order requires substantiated evidence, and disregarding laboratory test results violates procedural fairness and relevant le....
the absence of any material to show that petitioner is responsible for the quality of fertilizers seized, the proceedings now initiated against the petitioner is nothing but an abuse of process of la....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.