SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1022

VIJAY BISHNOI
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Jayant Mahecha, Advocate, Sharvan Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.28/2019 of Police Station, Karda, District Jalore for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15 of NDPS act and 465 and 476 of I.P.C. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that he along with co-accused Om Prakash have transported huge quantity of narcotic contraband poppy straw above commercial quantity in a vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that in the charge-sheet, the police has concluded that they have identified the petitioner and co-accused Om Prakash on the basis of CCTV footage of the road from where the vehicle was passed.

4. It is further submitted that the co-accused Om Prakash has already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 12.01.2022 and case of the petitioner is not distinguishable from him.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application, however, he is not in a position to d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top