SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1324

VIJAY BISHNOI
Ghanshyam – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vijay Kumar Gaur, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J . - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.12/2020 of Police Station Begu, District Chittorgarh for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 8/25 and 8/29 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that he shifted the narcotic contraband from one place to another. It is further submitted that no recovery has been affected from the petitioner. It is argued that the petitioner was running a pickup on hire and upon asking of one person, he shifted some bags from one place to another without knowing that the bags contained narcotic contraband. It is further submitted that the main accused Pappu, from whom the narcotic contraband was recovered, has already been enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top