SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1099

VIJAY BISHNOI
Manjindra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B. Ray Bishnoi, Advocate, Vijay Raj Bishnoi, Advocate, S.K. Bhati, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.76/2019 of Police Station Rajgarh, Distt. Churu for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 8/25, 8/18, 8/29, 25 and 29 of the NDPS act. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as per the prosecution story, the petitioners along with one Sukhram were apprehended by the police and the police seized three bags containing narcotic contraband poppy straw weighing 32 kgs each from a truck, in which, the petitioners were travelling. Learned counsel has submitted that the I.O. (PW-1), in his statement recorded before the trial court, has clearly admitted that during the course of investigation, the police has come to the conclusion that all the three accused persons were in possession of one bag containing narcotic contraband poppy straw weighing 32 kgs each. Learned counsel has submitted that from the above piece of evidence of the I.O., it is clear that the petitioners were in possession of narcotic contraband below co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top