HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vijay Bishnoi, J.
Manjindra Singh & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13157 of 2021, 759 of 2022
Decided On : 19-05-2022
NDPS Act - Bail Application - The court granted bail to the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. after considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners were arrested for possession of narcotic contraband poppy straw and filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted bail to the petitioners without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Issues: The issue was whether the petitioners should be granted bail in connection with the possession of narcotic contraband poppy straw.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and granted bail to the petitioners.
Final Decision: The bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed, and the petitioners were directed to be released on bail.
JUDGMENT
Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.76/2019 of Police Station Rajgarh, Distt. Churu for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 8/25, 8/18, 8/29, 25 and 29 of the NDPS act. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as per the prosecution story, the petitioners along with one Sukhram were apprehended by the police and the police seized three bags containing narcotic contraband poppy straw weighing 32 kgs each from a truck, in which, the petitioners were travelling. Learned counsel has submitted that the I.O. (PW-1), in his statement recorded before the trial court, has clearly admitted that during the course of investigation, the police has come to the conclusion that all the three accused persons were in possession of one bag containing narcotic contraband poppy straw weighing 32 kgs each. Learned counsel has submitted that from the above piece of evidence of the I.O., it is clear that the petitioners were in possession of narcotic contraband below commercial quantity.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application(s).
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
6. accordingly, this/these bail application(s) filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is/are allowed and it is directed that petitioner(s) - Manjindra Singh S/o Sh. Gurucharan Singh and Salim Mohammed S/o Hayat Mohammed shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.76/2019 of Police Station Rajgarh, Distt. Churu provided he/she/they execute(s) a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his/her/their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case.
Possession of narcotic contraband below commercial quantity can be a basis for granting bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The court considered the quantity of the narcotic contraband opium alleged to have been recovered as a key factor in granting bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case.
Granting bail based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court considered the narcotic contraband quantity and the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case in granting bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
A person accused under the NDPS Act may be granted bail if there is no recovery of narcotic contraband from them and if they can demonstrate a lack of knowledge regarding the nature of the goods bein....
The court considered the total weight of the recovered narcotic substances and poppy straw, which was below commercial quantity, in granting bail to the accused petitioner.
The court established that the presence of a commercial quantity of narcotics invokes the stringent bail provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, limiting the possibility of bail in such cases.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.