SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1010

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, SAMEER JAIN
Pradeep Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Prem Shanker Sharma Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

1. Petitioners, claiming to be pro bono publico, have filed this PIL petition for removal of obstruction on account of installation of statue of Shri Babasaheb Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar.

2. Petitioners state that the statue has been installed by unknown persons and despite representations made, the same is not being removed, which is causing obstruction to access to the colony where the petitioners reside. It is further submitted that earlier petition was filed, which was disposed off with direction to consider the representation followed by contempt petition, but tilldate, no concrete steps have been taken by Municipal Corporation, Jaipur, though a meeting was convened on 14.10.2019, copy of which has been placed on record as Annexure-12.

3. At the outset, we find that the petitioners have chosen only a particular spot in the city rather than coming out with general prayer for removal of installation of unauthorised statues in the city. Petition, therefore, appears to be only for personal interest, not for public interest.

4. We further find that after the orders were passed earlier, a meeting was convened by Municipal Corporation, Jaipur on 14.10.2019, but the issue has still rema

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top