SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1060

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Jitendra Ojha, Advocate, N.S. Bhati, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.22/2022 of Police Station Mahila Thana, District Banswara, for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 376/511 of IPC. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application on behalf of the petitioner No.1 Sunil. However, he seeks liberty to file afresh after filing of the challan.

3. Hence, the bail application on behalf of petitioner No.1 Sunil is hereby dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.

4. So far as the petitioner No.2 Vikas is concerned, counsel for the petitioners submits that no specific role has been assigned to the petitioner No.2 and he is in judicial lock-up and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner No.2 Vikas.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application filed by the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and prope

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top