SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1086

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Jamna Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B. Ray Bishnoi, Advocate, Anees Bhurat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.475/2020, Police Station Devgarh, District Rajsamand, for the offences punishable under Sections 8/18 & 27-a of NDPS act.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused Bhanwar Lal and Bhagwan Lal have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the present petitioner is similar to the co-accused. Counsel further submits that no other criminal case has been registered against the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the fact that the similarly situated co-accused have already been granted bail, therefore, without expressing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top