SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1287

ARUN BHANSALI
Nayana Patidar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
O.P. Sangwa, Advocate, for the Appellant
Pankaj Sharma, AAG, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Arun Bhansali, J. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the rejection of her representation by the respondents to take into consideration her graduation qualification for the purpose of eligibility for the post of Teacher Gr. III (Level-I) pursuant to the advertisement dated 31.12.2021 (Annex. 1).

2. It is inter alia indicated that the advertisement indicated the requisite eligibility criteria, wherein, based on Senior Secondary, the requirement was at least 50% marks, however, for graduates, no minimum percentage was indicated.

3. The petitioner filled up her application form (Annex. 4) and indicated her qualifications, wherein, she indicated only Secondary, Senior Secondary, Bachelor of Elementary Education and REET 2021 marks and on account of inadvertence could not indicate her graduation marks, though, she has graduation to her credit as Bachelor of Science as is reflected from the degree produced as Annex. 2.

4. The petitioner before the declaration of the result, had approached this Court by filing SBCWP No. 3807/2022, which came to be disposed of on 16.3.2022, whereby, the petitioner was permitted to make a representation to the compet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top