SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 935

VIJAY BISHNOI
Devkaran – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.L. Bishnoi, Advocate, Mohd. Javed Guari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.227/2019 of Police Station Purani abadi, District Sri Ganganagar for the offence punishable under Section 8/22 NPDS act. He has preferred this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the prosecution story, 1250 tablets containing narcotic substance Tramadol weighing 500 gms. have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, however, out of 1250 only 10 tablets have been taken as samples and sent for FSL. It is also submitted that the police have not sent the total 1250 tablets for FSL and on this count alone the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the petitioner and submitted that since all the strips of 1250 tablets containing narcotic substance Tramadol weighing 500 gms. are similar in nature, only one strip has been collected for sample and, therefore, there is no illegality in the same. Hence, the petitioner is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top