SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2740

VIJAY BISHNOI
Ranjhe Khan @ Ranju Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kailash Khatri, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.57/2020 of Police Station Muklawa, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 8/22 and 29 NDPS Act. He has preferred this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the prosecution story, huge quantity of tablets containing narcotic substance above commercial quantity have been recovered at the instance of two co-accused persons viz. Firoz Khan and Aslam on 10.05.2020. It is also submitted that during the course of investigation, the above named two co-accused persons while in police custody have informed that they procured the said narcotic substance from the petitioner. It is further submitted that on the basis of the said information, the police have filed charge-sheet against the petitioner, though, it is well settled that any information supplied by the accused persons while in police custody is not admissible in evidence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the statements of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top