SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 817

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
ILIYAS @ TONI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS / 232 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Mohammad Akbar, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumapwat

The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if justified by circumstances, requiring compliance with specific bail conditions.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 389 - Application for suspension of sentence - The court considered the arguments of the appellant(s) and the circumstances of the case, determining it fit to suspend the sentence pending appeal - The accused-applicants must execute a personal bond and adhere to conditions for bail. (Paras 6-7)

(B) Appeal - The court emphasized the necessity for the accused to appear before the trial court annually until the appeal is decided, ensuring compliance with bail conditions. (Paras 7-8)

Facts of the case:
The application for suspension of sentence was filed by the accused-applicants, who were convicted in Sessions Case No.78/2021 on 14.01.2025. The court found it appropriate to suspend their sentence due to the anticipated duration of the appeal process.

Findings of Court:
The application for suspension of sentence is allowed, and the accused-applicants are to be released on bail upon meeting specified conditions.

Issues: The court addressed whether the circumstances warranted the suspension of the sentence pending appeal and the conditions for bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that given the likelihood of delay in appeal proceedings, it was justifiable to suspend the sentence, provided the accused comply with specified bail conditions.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

Order :

1. Heard.

2. Admit. Issue Notice.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent - State.

4. Call for record.

5. Heard on application for suspension of sentence No.228/2025.

6. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced by the appellant(s) and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant(s).

7. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C . [Section 430 (2) BNSS] is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, No.2, Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh vide judgment dated 14.01.2025 in Sessions Case No.78/2021 against the appellant-applicant(s) – 1. Iliyas @ Toni S/o Mohammed Idrish Sheikh and 2. Sayra Banu W/o Shri Mohammed Idrish Sheikh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal and he/she/they shall be released on bail provided he/she/they executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his/her/their appearance in this court on 10.03.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

8. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top