SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1696

VIJAY BISHNOI
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
J.S. Choudhary, Advocate, Pradeep Choudhary, Advocate, Manjeet Godara, Advocate, Mohd. Javed Gaur, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.220/2018 of Police Station Taranagar, District Churu for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 365, 395, 396, 325, 302, 323 and 149 IPC.

3. They have preferred these second bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the co-accused persons viz. Rajendra Singh @ Raju, Jaideep @ Saimond, Krishan Kumar and Vinod Kumar have already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Benches of this Court and the case of the petitioners is not distinguishable from that of co-accused.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications, however, he is not in a position to dispute the fact that the co-accused persons viz. Rajendra Singh @ Raju, Jaideep @ Saimond, Krishan Kumar and Vinod Kumar S/o Sultan have already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Benches of this Court and the case of the petitioners is not distinguishable from that of co-accused.

6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top