SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1011

VIJAY BISHNOI
Shambhu Singh @ Shambuda – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jai Kishan Rankawat, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.352/2022 of Police Station Bheem, District Rajsamand for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 395 IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that co-accused Mahipal Singh @ Khatri has already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.12.2022 and the case of the petitioner is not distinguishable from that of co-accused person.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application, however, he is not in a position to dispute the fact that co-accused Mahipal Singh @ Khatri has already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.12.2022 and the case of the petitioner is not distinguishable from that of co-accused person.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top