SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1018

VIJAY BISHNOI
Jagtaar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.J. Gupta, Advocate, Sharvan Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.109/2022 of Police Station Kesrisinghpur, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 332, 353, 336, 224, 225, 427 and 34 IPC. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are triable by Magistrate.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the fact that the alleged offences levelled against the petitioners are triable by Magistrate, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners - (1) Jagtaar Singh S/o Sh. Veer Singh and (2) Shehshah @ Shehenshah @ Seni S/o Sh. Jagtaar Singh shall be released

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top