SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1001

VIJAY BISHNOI
Dinesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhawani Singh Mertia, Advocate, Vikram Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.362/2022 of PS Kushalgarh, District Banswara for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 452, 341, 323, 427, 504, 506/149 I.P.C. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners No.1 Dinesh S/o Tamiya Pithaya, No.2 Arjun S/o Maniya Bhabhor and No.3 Irfan S/o Sal Mohammad Makrani @ Bhatu shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.362/2022 of PS Kushalgarh, District Banswara provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance befor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top