DINESH MEHTA
Balwan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Mehta, J. - The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') has been preferred for challenging the FIR No. 211 dated 19.10.2021, registered against the petitioners for offences under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 in the Police Station, Sadar, Nagaur.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that on perusal of the FIR, no offence for demand of dowry is made out and the complainant has vindictively enroped all the family members of her in-laws including petitioner No. 1 and 3, who are government servants in State of Haryana, only in order to harass them. It was also submitted that petitioner No. 3 is a physically challenged person.
3. While challenging the FIR, learned counsel for the petitioners highlighted that all the dowry articles including the car has been returned back to the complainant.
4. While contending that complainant Monika was residing separately with her husband Shakti Singh in Daadri, he argued that all the family members of the complainant's husband residing separately, have been alleged to be involved in demand o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.