SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1876

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Bahadur @ Badar & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 999 of 2022
Decided On : 15-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Hitendra Singh, Advocate, Mukhtyar Khan, Advocate

The court considered the triability of the offences, absence of cruelty to the animals, and the duration of the accused petitioners' custody in granting bail.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Offences under Rajasthan Bovine animal act - The court granted bail to the accused petitioners based on the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate, no cruelty was caused to the bovine animals, and the accused petitioners had been in custody for over a month.

Fact of the Case:

The accused petitioners filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with F.I.R. No.11/2022 Police Station Pratapgarh, for offences under Rajasthan Bovine animal act and animal Cruelty act.

Finding of the Court:

The court, considering the circumstances that the offences are triable by Magistrate, no cruelty was caused to the bovine animals, and the accused petitioners had been in custody for over a month, granted bail to the accused petitioners without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case.

Issues: Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Rajasthan Bovine animal act and animal Cruelty act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court granted bail to the accused petitioners based on the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate, no cruelty was caused to the bovine animals, and the accused petitioners had been in custody for over a month.

Final Decision: The bail application is allowed, and the accused-petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing the specified personal bond and sureties.

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners, who are in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.11/2022 Police Station Pratapgarh, registered for the offences under Sections 3, 5, 6 & 8 of Rajasthan Bovine animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) act, 1995 & Sections 11(3)D of the animal Cruelty act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the offences are triable by Magistrate; the accused petitioner are behind the bars for last more than one month; earlier no case is registered against the accused petitioners and no cruelty was caused to the bovine animals, therefore, in these circumstances, the accused petitioners may be granted benefit of the bail.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application ans submits that there is allegation of illegal transportation of 11 cows and 3 calf.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly to the fact that offences are triable by Magistrate, no cruelty is caused to the bovine animals, the accused petitioners are behind the bars since last one month and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the accused petitioners deserves to be accepted.

6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Bahadur @ Badar son of Bhagirath and (2) Govind son of Goverdhanlal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.11/2022 Police Station Pratapgarh, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each (out of which one surety shall be local) to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top