SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1911

FARJAND ALI
Batti Lal Meena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ankur Rastogi, Through VC, for the Appellant
Mr. Ramesh Choudhary, PP, for the Respondent

ORDER

1. By way of filing the instant miscellaneous petition, challenge has been made to the very lodging of FIR No. 74/2017 registered at Police Station CPS ACB, Jaipur (Out post Kota) and all consequential proceedings including submission of charge-sheet, taking cognizance and framing of charges.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prima facie, no offence under Section 8, 9 & 10 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is made out against the petitioner and therefore, filing of charge-sheet against the petitioner under the above provisions is bad in law. He further submits that the offence under Sections 13(1)(d) & 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is also not made out. He placed reliance on the judgment passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of P. Satyanarayana Murthy v. District Inspector of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr. [(2015) 10 SCC 152] and referred the para 20 of the judgment and submits that in view of the judgment cited above, the proceedings against the petitioner are required to be quashed and set aside.

3. He further submits that the allegations leveled in the FIR and the material collected during the course of the invest

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top