SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1631

ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Rambahadur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mukesh Mehra, Advocate for Mr. M.K. Kaushik, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. B.S. Sharma, PP, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision petition has been filed against the order dated 19.09.2019 passed by the Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act No.1, Jaipur in Criminal Case No.5/2018. Learned trial Court vide order dated 19.09.2019 has ordered to frame charge against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act of 1988').

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that no case under Section 7 of the Act of 1988 is prima facie made out against the petitioner. That he has wrongly been charged with the offence. That, so called demand of bribe was said to be made by Constable Rambahadur and Pratap but Pratap has not been made accused. That in this case, in fact, an FIR No.117/2016 was registered against one Himanshu Jain who is the complainant of this case. The petitioner was Investigating Officer of that FIR. Therefore, the complainant falsely lodged an FIR against the petitioner in this case. There is no legal evidence against the petitioner in this case to convict him. The memo of voice recorder transcription, has been drawn on 05.05.2016 in the presence of witnesses Pramod Kumar Sharma and Shas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top