SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1914

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Sharwan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Divakar Sharma, Advocate, Madan Lal Balai, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail application No. 767/2022

2. Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

3. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 206/2021, Police Station Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, District Jodhpur for the offence under Sections 341, 307, 327 of IPC and Sections 3/25, 5/25 and 27 of arms act.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is facing incarceration since 14.12.2021. He further submits that the petitioner was not present at the time of incident and no overt act is attributed to the present petitioner. There is no case of the like nature pending or decided against the petitioners. Therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

6. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as also the present situation of the co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top