SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1916

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Ummed Singh & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14075 of 2021, 434, 437 of 2022
Decided On : 03-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Suresh Joshi, Advocate, J.V.S. Deora, Advocate, S.P. Sharma, Advocate, Mukesh Trivedi, Advocate

Headnote:

Bail Application - POCSO Act - The court allowed the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C for the petitioners who were in custody in connection with offenses under the POCSO Act, 2012 and other sections. The court considered the circumstances of the case, the prolonged trial duration, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on jails before granting bail to the petitioners.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. They were in custody in connection with offenses under the POCSO Act, 2012 and other sections. The petitioners had been facing incarceration since 20.12.2021.

Finding of the Court:

The court, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prolonged trial duration, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on jails, allowed the bail applications and directed the release of the petitioners on bail.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners should be granted bail in connection with the offenses under the POCSO Act, 2012 and other sections, considering the circumstances of the case and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on jails.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the prolonged trial duration, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on jails, and the facts and circumstances of the case in granting bail to the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail applications and directed the release of the petitioners (Ummed Singh, Ganga Kanwar, and Su Shri Hiro Kanwar) on bail in connection with the offenses under the POCSO Act, 2012 and other sections, upon execution of a personal bond and sureties to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners do not want to press the interlocutory applications.

Dismissed accordingly.

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail application No. 14075/2021:-

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present bail application of Sajjan Singh, however, seeks liberty to file fresh bail application after recording the statement of Mst.'K' before the learned trial court.

4. accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid.

5. However, learned trial court shall explore the possibility of examining Mst.'K' at the earliest convenience.

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail application No. 434/2022:-

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail application No. 435/2022:-

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail application No. 437/2022:-

6. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners who are in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.121/2021, Police Station Dechu, District Jodhpur, for the offence under Sections 11/12, 16/17 the POCSO act, 2012 and Section 10 Child Marriage Prohibited act, 2006 and Section 363, 366-a, 120-B of IPC.

7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the charge sheet in the present cases has been filed. They further submit that petitioners Ganga Kanwar and Su Shri Hiro Kanwar are young ladies and they are facing incarceration since 20.12.2021. He further submits that as against Ummed Singh, there is no allegation as Ummed Singh was not present at the time of incident. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

9. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced as also the present situation of the country due to pandemic of corona virus (COVID-19), in particular the jails, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners are also entitled for the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

10. accordingly, the present bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners (1) Ummed Singh S/o Multan Singh (2) Ganga Kanwar W/o Shri Mohan Singh (3) Su Shri Hiro Kanwar D/o Indra Singh shall be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. No.121/2021, Police Station Dechu, District Jodhpur provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top