ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shyam @ Jagdish – Respondent
ORDER
1. A challenge in the instant misc. appeal has been made to the impugned judgment and award dated 05.12.2012 passed by the Court of learned Commissioner Workmen's Compensation, Bundi, Rajasthan (for short 'the learned Commissioner') in WCC/F//51/2011 by which the claim petition filed by the claimant-respondent has been allowed and the Insurance company has been directed to pay compensation of Rs.3,96,165/- to the claimant-respondent with interest.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the claimant-respondent filed a claim petition under the provisions of Workmen's Compensation Act, claiming compensation on account of death of one Kalulal who died in the road accident occurred on 26.01.2008. It was also stated in the claim petition that the death occurred during the course of the employment. Hence, the claimant is entitled to get compensation as the deceased was working as a 'Khalasi1 and drawing salary of Rs.4750/- per month.
3. The owner of the vehicle did not appear before the learned Commissioner and hence, ex parte proceedings were initiated against him but the appellant-Insurance Company has submitted its reply and denied the averments made in the claim petition and raised ob
Golla Rajanna Etc. vs. The Divisional Manager And Ann reported in 2017(1) SCC 45
North East Karnatka Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Sujatha reported in 2019 (11) SCC 514
Smt. Ram Sakhi Devi Vs. Chhatra Devi
M/s Krishna Weaving Mills, Ajmer Vs. Smt. Chandra Bhaga Devi wide of Mool Chand & Anr.
Limited jurisdiction of the High Court in appeals under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
The limited jurisdiction of the High Court to examine substantial questions of law only and not to reappreciate evidence or findings of fact.
Limited jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act to examine substantial questions of law only.
The appellate jurisdiction of the High Court is confined only to examine the substantial questions of law arising in the case, as provided under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
The judgment established the principle that the High Court's jurisdiction under the Workmen's Compensation Act is confined to examining substantial questions of law only.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and it cannot re-evaluate factual findings.
The main legal point established is the limited jurisdiction of the High Court to examine substantial questions of law under the Workmen's Compensation Act, emphasizing the finality of the Commission....
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law; it cannot re-evaluate evidence or disturb findings unless they are pervers....
The appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is confined to substantial questions of law, prohibiting re-evaluation of factual findings.
The High Court's jurisdiction in appeals under the Workmen Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and it cannot re-evaluate evidence or findings of fact.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.