SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1760

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Salim S/o Ghasi Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 143 of 2022
Decided On : 25-01-2022

Advocates appeared:
Abhishek Charan, Advocate, Mukesh Trivedi, Advocate

The court's discretion in granting anticipatory bail and the option to surrender and file a bail application before the trial court.

Headnote:

Anticipatory Bail - Offences under IPC - Court denies anticipatory bail but directs petitioner to surrender and file bail application before trial court

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed an application for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 326 and 34 of IPC.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, denied the anticipatory bail application but directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and file a bail application there.

Issues: Application for anticipatory bail, opposition by the Public Prosecutor, petitioner's readiness to surrender and file bail application before trial court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of accusation, gravity of the offence, and the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case in denying anticipatory bail but directed the petitioner to surrender and file a bail application before the trial court.

Final Decision: The application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was rejected, but the petitioner was directed to surrender before the trial court and file a bail application there.

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

2. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.169/2021, Police Station Dungla, District Chittorgarh for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 326 and 34 of IPC.

3. Heard. Perused the material available on record.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusation, the gravity of the offence, material on record in support thereof and taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to extend the benefit under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner. accordingly, the application preferred by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is hereby rejected.

6. However, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is ready to surrender before the concerned court, which may consider his bail application on the same day.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice, it is directed that if the petitioner Salim S/o Ghasi Khan surrenders before the trial Court on or before 13/02/2022 and file a bail application there, the Court concerned shall consider his bail application preferably on the same day in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top