JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

2. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.169/2021, Police Station Dungla, District Chittorgarh for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 326 and 34 of IPC.

3. Heard. Perused the material available on record.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusation, the gravity of the offence, material on record in support thereof and taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to extend the benefit under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner. accordingly, the application preferred by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is hereby rejected.

6. However, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is ready to surrender before the concerned court, which may consider his bail application on the sam