HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Sameer Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17 of 2022
Decided On : 18-01-2022
Anticipatory Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. considering the peculiar circumstances prevailing in the country due to the pandemic of COVID-19.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed for anticipatory bail in connection with F.I.R. No.550/2021, Police Station Jawahar Nagar, District Sriganganagar for the offences under Sections 392, 34, 120-B of IPC.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was not present at the place of incident and was not reflecting his presence in the CCTV footage. Considering the peculiar circumstances prevailing in the country due to the pandemic of COVID-19, the court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with the mentioned offences.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the absence of the petitioner at the place of incident and in the CCTV footage, along with the peculiar circumstances prevailing in the country due to the pandemic of COVID-19, as the basis for granting anticipatory bail.
Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the petitioner was directed to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).
2. This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.550/2021, Police Station Jawahar Nagar, District Sriganganagar for the offences under Sections 392, 34, 120-B of IPC.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the petitioner was present on the place of incident nor he has been alleged any role in the present incident.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor on the strength of case diary submits that since the petitioner was talking to the principal accused persons, therefore, on the basis of call details, he has been implicated. However, learned public prosecutor submits that on the date of incident, the petitioner was not present nor he is reflecting his presence in the CCTV Footage taken from the place of incident.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced and also considering the peculiar circumstances prevailing in the country due to the pandemic of COVID-19, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
7. accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Sameer Khan S/o Gani Khan, in connection with F.I.R. No.550/2021, Police Station Jawahar Nagar, District Sriganganagar, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-
(I) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
Granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in view of the peculiar circumstances prevailing in the country due to the pandemic of COVID-19.
The court's discretion in granting anticipatory bail and the option to surrender and file a bail application before the trial court.
The court's decision was influenced by the nature of accusation, gravity of the offence, and material on record in rejecting the anticipatory bail application, but also considered the interest of jus....
The court's decision was influenced by the nature of accusation, gravity of the offence, and material on record in rejecting the anticipatory bail application.
The court has the discretion to reject an application for anticipatory bail but may direct the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and file a bail application for consideration.
The court's decision was influenced by the nature of accusation, gravity of the offence, and material on record in rejecting the bail applications, but also emphasized the option for the petitioners ....
The court considered the petitioner's incarceration, absence at the time of the incident, and the lack of pending or decided cases against the petitioner, along with the unprecedented situation of th....
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the unprecedented situation of the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on the situation of the jails, justifying the release of the petitioner on bai....
The court may consider the unprecedented situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the jails, as a justifiable ground for granting bail.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the interpretation of Section 439 Cr.P.C. in light of the similarity of the case with the co-accused persons who had been enlarged on bail and the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.