SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1795

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Leela W/o Mahendra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vivek Sharma, Advocate, S.K. Bhati, Advocate, R.S. Chundawat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

2. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners who are in custody in connection with FIR No.32/2021, registered at Police Station Rol, District Nagaur for the offence punishable under Sections 498-a, 302 & 201 of IPC.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased. He further submits that there is no specific allegation of demand of dowry on the present petitioners. He, therefore, prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the bail application.

6. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as also the present situation of the country due to pandemic of corona virus (COVID-19), in particular the jails, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioners

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top