SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1814

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sandeep Mehta, Vinod Kumar Bharwani, JJ.
Suresh Thanvi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 6390 of 2020
Decided On : 17-01-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Avin Chhangani, for the Appellant
Mr. Rajesh Panwar through VC, Mr. Sunil Beniwal, AAG through VC, Mr. Aniket Tater for Mr. Manoj Bhandari, through VC., for the Respondent.

Reservation of land for public park use must be upheld, and unauthorized commercial activities and constructions on public land must be prevented.

Headnote:

Public Park - PIL - The court directed the Municipal Corporation to ensure that the land reserved for a public park is strictly used as such, prohibiting any commercial activities and ordering the development of the park with tree plantation, lawn, and open-air gym equipments.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a PIL alleging that the land reserved for a public park was being used for commercial purposes and unauthorized constructions were raised on the land.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the Municipal Corporation to ensure that the land in question is strictly used as a public park, prohibiting commercial activities and ordering the development of the park.

Issues: Unauthorized use of public park land for commercial purposes and unauthorized constructions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need to uphold the reservation of land for public park use and to prevent unauthorized commercial activities and constructions on public land.

Final Decision: The writ petition (PIL) was disposed of with the direction to the Municipal Corporation to ensure the land is strictly used as a public park and to develop the park accordingly.

ORDER

1. We have heard and considered the submissions advanced at bar and, have gone through the material available on record.

2. The petitioner Suresh Thanvi has approached this Court by way of this writ petition in the nature of PIL with the following prayers:

    "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ or order:-

    (i) directing the respondents/authorities to prevent/stop the use of the afore-mentioned public park for any private purpose including use as Marriage Hall or as a cattle ranch;

    (ii) to prevent/stop any illegal construction in the said public park which is indisputably a public land and demolish the illegal construction already raised;

    (iii) to direct the respondents/authorities, particularly, respondent No.2 to ensure proper development and maintenance of the public park in question, keeping in mind the battle against Covid-19."

    3. The grievance which the petitioner has raised in this writ petition is that the land reserved for public park is being put to other commercial uses viz. marriages parties, etc. in contravention of the directions given by this Court in the case of Gulab Kothari Vs. State of Rajasthan (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1554/2004) decided on 12.01.2017. A grievance has also been raised that unauthorised constructions have been raised on the land in question and hence, the same should be ordered to be demolished.

    4. The respondent Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur, in reply to the writ petition, has admitted existence of the public park between the Street No.1 and Street No.2, Opposite Plots No.467 and 468, Milkmen Colony, Jodhpur regarding which, the petitioner has raised this grievance. Regarding the allegation of illegal construction, it is stated in the reply that a hall was constructed by the JDA on a piece of land adjoining the park whereas, the first floor was constructed by the Municipal Corporation with some public toilets/ urinals. The construction was raised 3-4 years ago and an assurance has been given in the reply that no further construction activities shall be undertaken in the land of park.

    5. In view of the above undisputed position, it is hereby directed that the respondent No.2 Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur shall ensure that the land in question shall be strictly used as a public park and no deviation shall be permitted in this regard. No commercial activities viz. marriages/ parties, etc. shall be allowed thereupon. The Municipal Corporation shall develop the park by tree plantation and by planting lawn, etc. therein. The Municipal Corporation shall also install open air gym equipments in the park so that the residents of the locality can use the same for their health benefits.

    6. The writ petition (PIL) is disposed of in the above manner. Stay application also stands disposed of.

    7. No order as to costs.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top