Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, C.J, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Nand Kishore, Son of Sri Ram Pravesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application (PIL) has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction for an enquiry and investigation into the alleged illegal construction of shops, installation of a garbage compactor machine, and allotment of land for parking vehicles by inviting tender over a piece of land by the Dhanbad Municipal Corporation, which was leased to be used as a park. Further direction has also been sought to demolish the illegally constructed shops, garbage compactor machine, and for removal of all sorts of nuisance in and around the public utility land (ladies and children Park).
The petitioner has also prayed that a direction be given for initiating action against the erring officials who are responsible for the change of utility over the land and further prayer has been made to direct the respondent to operationalize, restore the beauty and greenery of the park in its original position.
3. The land forming the subject matter of the present petition is situated at Municipal survey plot no. 1117 in Mauza Hirapur, Thana No. 07 in the district of Dhanbad measuring 4.82 acres.
4. The petitioner claims to b
Public interest litigations must demonstrate concrete public interest, and allegations of unauthorized land use must be supported by substantive evidence to be entertained.
PIL closed as joint inspection found no public land encroachment, illegal constructions on private land addressed by authorities via sealing and notices, and intervener pursuing parallel civil suit f....
Reservation of land for public park use must be upheld, and unauthorized commercial activities and constructions on public land must be prevented.
Construction on land recorded as public land cannot be permitted if administrative findings support its public use.
A public interest litigation cannot be used by a petitioner who previously supported the actions being challenged, as it constitutes an abuse of the judicial process.
Public interest litigation is not applicable when targeting a specific property owned by an individual, and separate legal actions must be pursued for such disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India should not be used to determine administrative matters, and t....
Public interest litigations must be filed by individuals acting bona fide in genuine public interest; misuse for personal motives is impermissible.
Public Interest Litigations cannot be utilized by individuals with personal interests, as they lack the necessary standing to join proceedings framed under public benefit considerations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
