ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Vijendra – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Revenue For Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 29.10.2004, passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer, whereby, revision petition filed by the respondent No.2-Smt.Sarati (deceased) has been allowed and order of Sub- Divisional Officer dated 19.04.1999, rejecting the review petition filed by the respondent, has been set aside.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that initially judgment and decree dated 09.08.1994 was passed, whereby, suit for declaration and permanent injunction, was decreed on the basis of compromise, said to be entered into between the parties.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the judgment and decree dated 09.08.1994 was put to challenge, by filing a review petition, before the SDO, on an application being filed by respondent No.2-Sarati (deceased) & No.15-Badami.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the review application filed by the respondents-Sarati and Badami, was dismissed by SDO on 19.04.1999, by holding that only clerical mistake could have been corrected in the review petition and there was no error apparent on the face of record.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.