SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 761

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Bhakhara Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. B.L. Bishnoi, for Petitioner

ORDER

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The present writ petition has been filed against the interim order dated 27.12.2023 passed by learned Board of Revenue in Revision Petition No.6591/2023 (Dhanna Ram V/s Bhakhara Ram).

3. Briefly the facts necessary to be narrated are that the petitioner preferred an application under section 251-A of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1956 which was allowed by the Assistant Collector & Sub Divisional Officer, Sewda District Barmer vide his order dated 01.08.2023. Against the order dated 01.08.2023, the respondent Nos.2 & 3 Dhanna Ram and Pema Ram preferred an appeal before the Revenue Appellate Authority, Barmer. The Revenue Appellate Authority vide its order dated 13.12.2023 rejected the appeal filed by the private respondents. Aggrieved against rejection of appeal, the private respondent Dhanna Ram preferred a Revision Petition before the Board of Revenue, Ajmer. Learned Board of Revenue while issuing notices on 27.12.2023 called for the record and also ordered for maintaining status quo with respect to the land in question. Hence, aggrieved against the same, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top