SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 922

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Mangi Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Jitendra Ojha, Advocate, S.S. Rajpurohit, Advocate, B.L. Dudy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.121/2022, Police Station Sadar, District Barmer registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to the injury report of the injured Sunita, she received one injury on her head and as per X-Ray report, the injury is found to be simple in nature; petitioner is a lady and she is in the judicial custody; and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

6. accordingly, the bail application under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top