SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1981

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Sunil Kareer – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vijay Bishnoi, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.75/2020, Police Station Nokha, Distt. Bikaner for the offence under Sections 302, 307, 324, 436, 427, 147, 148 & 149 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused have already been granted bail by this Court and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from those of the co-accused. Challan of the case has already been presented and no investigation is pending. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

6. accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top