IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
PANKAJ BHANDARI, ANIL KUMAR UPMAN, JJ.
State of Rajasthan, through P.P. - Petitioner
Versus
Sundar @ Surendra @ Santu, S/o. Nagaji - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Death Reference No. 4 of 2021 Connected With D.B. Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 185 of 2021
Decided On : 14-03-2023
POCSO Act - Death Penalty - Section 366 of Cr.P.C. - [POCSO Act] - [Death Penalty, Section 376(A) IPC and Section 5(j)(iv)/6 of POCSO Act] - [Summary: The court confirmed the death penalty awarded to the accused for the offences under Sections 376(A), 376(3), 302 and 201 IPC and Section 5(j)(iv)/6 of the POCSO Act. The court analyzed the evidence and found that the accused was present near the place of incident and was not looking comfortable. The recovery of blood-stained clothes of the accused, DNA matching, and the failure of the accused to establish his defense led to the conviction. The court commuted the death penalty to life imprisonment based on the mitigating circumstances including the age of the accused, the fact that he is a father of a girl child, and his lack of criminal antecedents. The court referred to several cases where death penalty was converted into life imprisonment to support its decision. The death reference was declined and the appeal filed by the accused was partly allowed, commuting the death penalty to life imprisonment.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased went for goat herding and her half-naked dead body was found with signs of sexual assault. The accused was arrested and charged with offences under Sections 376(A), 376(3), 302, and 201 IPC and Sections 3/4, 5(n)(j)(iv)/6 of POCSO Act. The prosecution presented evidence including recovery of blood-stained clothes, DNA matching, and medical reports. The accused denied the charges but failed to establish his defense. The trial court convicted and sentenced the accused to death.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the accused guilty based on the recovery of blood-stained clothes, DNA matching, and the failure to establish his defense. The court commuted the death penalty to life imprisonment considering the mitigating circumstances including the age of the accused, the fact that he is a father of a girl child, and his lack of criminal antecedents.
Issues: The main issue was the guilt of the accused in the face of circumstantial evidence including recovery of blood-stained clothes and DNA matching. The court also considered the appropriateness of the death penalty in light of the mitigating circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the recovery of blood-stained clothes, DNA matching, and the failure of the accused to establish his defense. The court also considered the mitigating circumstances including the age of the accused, the fact that he is a father of a girl child, and his lack of criminal antecedents in commuting the death penalty to life imprisonment.
Final Decision: The death penalty was commuted to life imprisonment based on the mitigating circumstances. The death reference was declined and the appeal filed by the accused was partly allowed, commuting the death penalty to life imprisonment.
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kumar Upman, J.
1. This reference has been received from the Court of Special Judge, POCSO Act, 2012 & Commission for Child Rights Protection Act, 2005, No.1, Ajmer (for short, "the trial court") under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for brevity, "Cr.P.C.") for confirmation of the death sentence awarded to the accused Sundar @ Surendra @ Santu vide its judgment and order dated 26.10.2021 passed in Sessions Case No.58/2021 arising out of FIR No.128/2021 registered at the Police Station Pushkar, District Ajmer. Separate appeal (No.185/2021) has also been filed by the accused Sundar @ Surendra @ Santu challenging his conviction and sentence against the very same judgment.
2. The accused-appellant had faced trial in Sessions Case No.58/2021 and vide the aforesaid judgment and order dated 26.10.2021, he has been convicted and sentenced as below:-
| Offence | Sentences and fine awarded |
| Section 376 (A) IPC and Section 5(j) (iv)/6 of POCSO Act | Death penalty, subject to confirmation of the High Court |
| Section 376 (3) IPC | Life imprisonment which shall extend to remainder of his natural life with a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, 3 years' additional simple imprisonment |
| Section 201 IPC | 7 years’ rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine, 1 month’s additional simple imprisonment |
| All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently | |
3. Brief facts relevant and essential for disposal of the instant death reference as well as the appeal preferred by the accused appellant are noted hereinbelow:-
4. As per the prosecution case, on 21.06.2021 at about 10.00 AM, the deceased went for goat herding on the hills of Baijnath Temple. Usually, she returned home at about 6:30 PM but when she did not return in evening, she was searched at all probable places by her family members and other villagers. In night at about 12.00 PM, her half-naked dead body was found about 300 meters away from the hills of Baijnath temple. Her jeans pant was lying nearby and same was stained with blood. The police was informed about this incident and on this information, SHO Police Station Pushkar along with Special Police team reached at the place of incident and took photographs of the scene. Blood-stained soil, three blood-stained stones, jeans pant of the deceased and one aadhar card belonging to the accused Sundar were also seized and sealed in presence of witnesses.
5. On 22.06.2021 at about 5.00 am, a written report (Ex.P/4) was submitted by PW-3 (father of the deceased) to the SHO PS Pushkar, which reads as under:-
lsok esa]
Jheku~ Fkkuk vf/kdkjh th
iqfyl Fkkuk iq"dj
vtesj
fo"k;%& eqdnek ntZ djokus ckcr~A
egksn;]
fuosnu gS fd eSa lq[kkflag iq= HkS: flag jkor fuoklh gksdjk mez 55 o"kZ dy fnukad 21-06-2021 dks esjh iq=h liuk mez 11 o"kZ lqcg 10 cts ?kj ls cS/kukFk egknso dh igkfM+;ksa ij cdjh;k pjkus fudyh 'kke dks jkstkuk djhc 6-30 ih-,e- ij ?kj vk tkfr Fkh ysfdu dy 'kke dks ?kj ij ugha vkbZ rc eq>s o ifjokj tuksa dks fpUrk gqbZ rc geus xkao okys dks crk;k fd esjh iq=h liuk ?kj ugha vkbZ ifjokj o xkao okyks us lg;ksx djrs gq, cS/kukFk dh igkfM;ksa ij dkQh ryk'k djus ij djhc jkf= dks 12 cts ds yxHkx cS/kukFk efUnj ds if'pe nf{k.k fn'kk esa igkM+h ds mij esjh iq=h liuk e`r voLFkk esa iMh feyh ftldh ftUl dh isUV lkbZM esa iMh Fkh o v.Mj fo;j nk;us ikao esa vVdh gqbZ Fkh flj ij ,d eksVk iRFkj iM+k gqvk Fkk psgjss o 'kjhj ij pksVs vkbZ gqbZ Fkh o [kwu fc[kjk gqvk FkkA fdlh vKkr O;fDr }kjk esjh ukckfyx iq=h ds lkFk cykRdkj dj mldh gR;k dh xbZ gSA vr% Jheku~ ls fuosnu gS fd vKkr O;fDr ds f[kykQ eqdnek ntZ dj mfpr dkuwuh dk;Zokgh djsaA
Hkonh;
xxx
6. On the basis of aforesaid written report (Ex.P/4), a formal FIR No.128/2021 (Ex.P/23) was registered at Police Station Pushka
Rajeev Singh Vs. State of Bihar
Rahul vs. State of Maharashtra
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab
Tdiga Annamma Vs. State of Andra Pradesh
Machhi Singh vs. State of Punjab
Nirmal Singh v. State of Haryana
AI
The court upheld the conviction based on circumstantial evidence and mitigated the death penalty to life imprisonment considering the age of the accused, the fact that he is a father of a girl child,....
The judgment underscores the importance of a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and the evidentiary weight of DNA analysis in securing a conviction for serious crimes.
The court ruled that the death penalty is not warranted in this case, emphasizing the need for a balance between aggravating and mitigating circumstances, ultimately commuting the sentence to 30 year....
The imposition of the death penalty requires the statutory provision of special reasons, and a balancing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances must be conducted.
Circumstantial evidence, particularly the 'last seen' principle, can suffice for conviction in rape and murder cases yet demands rigorous scrutiny for reliability.
(1) Constitutional guarantees of equality before law, protection of life and personal liberty, protection in respect of conviction, and protection against arrest and detention, do not expand into a c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.