A. S. CHANDURKAR, JITENDRA JAIN
Sagar Satish Patil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jitendra Jain, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.
2. By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has prayed for following relief :
3. Brief facts are as under :-
(ii) The Petitioner, has completed age of 35 years on 24th November 2021 and therefore was age barred to apply for the post of JMFC since he was ineligible candidate for JMFC-2021 examination.
(iii) On 17th December 2021, the Respondent No.1-State issued a Government Resolution relaxing the age for direct service recruitment as a one time measure on account of pandemic.
(iv) On 3rd January 2022, the Petitioner made a representation to Res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.