DINESH MEHTA
Omprakash S/o. Shri Bohra Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Ayurved and Indian Medical Department, Government of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. All these writ petitions involve common question of facts and law and, thus, the same are being decided conjointly by this common order.
2. The facts, however, are being taken from S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15081/2021 (Omprakash vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.).
3. The petitioner was engaged as a Class IV employee by the respondent University through a Contractor on 03.05.2005; he is continuing as such till today, of course, through different contractors/placement agencies.
4. The petitioner earlier preferred a writ petition bearing number 12596/2018 seeking regularization of his services on the post of Class IV. When the bunch of writ petitions alongwith writ petition filed by the petitioner was being heard by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 04.08.2020 (Annexure-12), an assertion was made on behalf of the petitioner that services of one Manoj Dave working as a contractual employee through placement agency has been regularized by the respondent – University.
5. It is to be noted that such assertion made by the petitioner was disputed by the respondent – University
State of Karnataka & Ors. vs. M.L. Kesri & Ors.
Sheo Narayan Nagar & Ors. vs. State of UP & Ors.
Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Ors. vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Amarkant Rai vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. vs. Mahendra Prasad Jakhmola & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.