Back
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dwarika Bai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Civil Misc. Appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 30 of Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 (for short, the Act of 1923) against the judgment dated 17.10.2012 passed by Employee’s Compensation Commissioner, Bundi in claim case no. W.C.A./F/73/2011 titled as Dwarika Bai & Anr. Vs. Madhusudan Sharma & Anr., whereby an award of Rs.6,50,730/-with interest of Rs.1,03,033/-has been passed in favour of the claimants-respondents and against the appellant and it has also directed that in case the amount is not paid within 30 days, then the interest @ 12% per annum shall be payable additionally.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that learned Commissioner wrongly allowed the claim petition filed by the claimants. Learned counsel for the appellant has also submits that there is no evidence that alleged accident took place. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is no evidence that the deceased was employed as a Khalasi by the owner of the insured vehicle. Learned counsel for the appellant also submits that the claimants as well as owner failed to prove the income of the deceased. So, appeal be allowed and judgment 17.10.2012 passed by Work
The appeal under the Workmen Compensation Act is confined to substantial questions of law, and factual findings by the Commissioner are generally conclusive.
The limited jurisdiction of the High Court to examine substantial questions of law only and not to reappreciate evidence or findings of fact.
The judgment established the principle that the High Court's jurisdiction under the Workmen's Compensation Act is confined to examining substantial questions of law only.
The High Court's review under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is confined to substantial questions of law, not factual re-evaluations.
The appellate jurisdiction of the High Court is confined only to examine the substantial questions of law arising in the case, as provided under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
The main legal point established is the limited jurisdiction of the High Court to examine substantial questions of law under the Workmen's Compensation Act, emphasizing the finality of the Commission....
Limited jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923, allows appeals only on substantial questions of law.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law; it cannot re-evaluate evidence or disturb findings unless they are pervers....
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, preventing re-appreciation of evidence or disturbance of factual findings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
