ORDER

1. This civil misc. appeal has been filed by the appellant u/s 30 of Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 (for short, the Act of 1923) against the judgment dt. 14.8.2012 passed by learned Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Ajmer in claim case no. WCA (F) 11/2011 Ranchhor Das vs. Mohd. Suleman and ors. whereby an award of Rs.6,42, 666/- with interest @ 12% has been passed in favour of the claimants respondents and against the appellant.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that learned Commissioner wrongly allowed the claim petition filed by the claimants. Learned counsel for the appellant has also submits that there is no evidence that alleged accident took place and who had seen it. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is no evidence that the deceased was employed as a Khalasi by the owner of the insured vehicle. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that alleged incident took place on 9.8.2010 but FIR was lodged after an inordinate delay of 23 days i.e. on 2.9.2010. So, appeal be allowed and judgment 14.8.2012 passed by Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Ajmer be set aside.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant has relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble A