Back
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Narendra Singh Dhaddha, J.
1. This Civil Misc. Appeal has been filed by the appellant- Insurance Company (for short 'the Insurance Company') under section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short, the Act of 1923) against the judgment dated 09.05.2017 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Act, Jaipur District No. 2, Jaipur (for short 'the learned Commissioner') in claim case No. ECCNF 132/2010 titled as “Neeraj v. Rajpal and Anr.” whereby learned Commissioner has awarded a sum of Rs.1,37,331/- alongwith interest @ 12% P.A. w.e.f. 23.01.2010 in favour of the claimant-respondent No. 1 (for short 'the claimant').
2. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company submits that learned Commissioner wrongly allowed the claim petition filed by the claimant. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company also submits that there was no relationship of employee and employer between the claimant and owner of the vehicle. Learned counsel for the insurance company further submits that vehicle so insured was being driven in absence of a valid and effective driving license. So, appeal be allowed and judgment dated 09.05.2017 passed by learned Commissioner be set aside.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, preventing re-appreciation of evidence or disturbance of factual findings.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and it cannot re-appreciate evidence or disturb factual findings.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and it cannot re-evaluate factual findings.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law; it cannot re-evaluate evidence or disturb findings unless they are pervers....
The main legal point established is the limited jurisdiction of the High Court to examine substantial questions of law under the Workmen's Compensation Act, emphasizing the finality of the Commission....
The appellate jurisdiction of the High Court is confined only to examine the substantial questions of law arising in the case, as provided under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
Limited jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act to examine substantial questions of law only.
The limited jurisdiction of the High Court to examine substantial questions of law only and not to reappreciate evidence or findings of fact.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
