IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Kuldeep Mathur, J.
Santosh @ Santudi & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1191, 1490 of 2023
Decided On : 13-04-2023
Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted bail to the accused-petitioners (Smt. Santosh and Sukha Ram) who were arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.314/2022 for various offences under the IPC, considering the length of the trial and the nature of the injuries alleged against the petitioners.
Fact of the Case:
The accused-petitioners were arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.314/2022 for offences under Sections 143, 323, 342, 307 and 302 of the IPC. The bail applications were filed citing the length of the trial and the nature of injuries alleged against the petitioners.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, granted bail to the accused-petitioners, Smt. Santosh and Sukha Ram, considering the circumstances and the length of the trial.
Issues: Bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the length of the trial and the nature of the injuries alleged against the accused-petitioners in granting bail.
Final Decision: The bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. were allowed, and the accused-petitioners were ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing the required personal bond and sureties.
JUDGMENT
Kuldeep Mathur, J. - These applications for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.314/2022 registered at Police Station Padukalan, District Nagaur for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 342, 307 and 302 of the IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as also the learned counsel representing the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners drew the attention of the Court towards the charge-sheet and statement of the injured/eye witness Surja Ram and submitted that specific allegations have been levelled against Rajuram and his wife of inflicting serious injuries upon Banshilal who succumbed to death. Learned counsel further submitted that against the accused Rajuram and Smt. Anita, charge-sheet has been filed for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 325, 341, 342, 307 and 302/34 IPC. Learned counsel further submitted that as far as the present petitioners are concerned, they have been alleged of causing injuries to injured/eye witness which are simple in nature. Learned counsel further submitted that even the investigating agency has filed charge-sheet against the present petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 325, 341 and 307/34 IPC. Learned counsel submitted that since challan has been filed, the petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel representing the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications.
5. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail applications filed by the petitioners deserve to be accepted.
6. Consequently, these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Smt. Santosh @ Santudi W/o Hari Ram and (2) Sukha Ram S/o Bhiya Ram, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.314/2022 registered at Police Station Padukalan, District Nagaur, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for their appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
7. A copy of this order be placed in each file.
The court may grant bail considering the length of the trial and the nature of the injuries alleged against the accused.
The court's decision to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was influenced by the consideration of the statements recorded in the charge-sheet and the conclusion of the Police after the investigatio....
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the consideration of the nature of injuries, the potential delay in the trial, and the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case.
The principle of parity in bail applications, where similarly situated co-accused are granted bail, is a significant factor in determining the grant of bail.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the trial is expected to be lengthy and the offences are triable by a magistrate, highlighting the importance of the righ....
The court considered the absence of evidence for specific offences and the length of the trial in granting bail to the accused petitioners.
The voluntary living of the prosecutrix with the accused-petitioner influenced the court's decision in granting bail.
Bail can be granted when allegations involve simple injuries, no criminal history exists, and trial duration is expected to be lengthy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.