SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 875

KULDEEP MATHUR
Santosh @ Santudi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jagdish Singh, Advocate, Ajay Kumar, Advocate, Shrawan Kumar, Advocate, M.S. Soni., Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - These applications for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.314/2022 registered at Police Station Padukalan, District Nagaur for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 342, 307 and 302 of the IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as also the learned counsel representing the complainant and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners drew the attention of the Court towards the charge-sheet and statement of the injured/eye witness Surja Ram and submitted that specific allegations have been levelled against Rajuram and his wife of inflicting serious injuries upon Banshilal who succumbed to death. Learned counsel further submitted that against the accused Rajuram and Smt. Anita, charge-sheet has been filed for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 325, 341, 342, 307 and 302/34 IPC. Learned counsel further submitted that as far as the present petitioners are concerned, they have been alleged of causing injuries to injured/eye witness which are simple in nature. Learned counsel further submi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top