SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 981

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Harendra @ Heera Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sumer Singh Gour, Advocate, AR Choudhary, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.206/2017 Police Station Sardarpura, Jodhpur City West for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 & 120-B of IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. He has preferred this third bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that out of total 68 witnesses only 5 witness have been examined. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody for about five years and two months.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused person, namely, Bhoma Ram has already been enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the material available on record.

6. Thus, having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that similarly situated co-accused person has been granted bail and conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

7. Accor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top