SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1078

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Rajendra Vishnoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 32 of 2023
Decided On : 03-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Bhanwaru Ram, Advocate, Mukesh Trivedi, Advocate

Grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Grant of Bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. - The court granted bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No.411/2021 for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of IPC. The petitioner preferred a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C, stating that the trial would take a long time to conclude.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Issues: The main issue was whether the accused petitioner should be granted bail considering the nature of the offences and the time it would take for the trial to conclude.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and decided to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Final Decision: The bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. was allowed, and it was directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.411/2021 of Police Station Shastrinagar, District Jodhpur West, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offences are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Rajendra Vishnoi S/o Sukhram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.411/2021 of Police Station Shastrinagar, District Jodhpur West provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top