IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Rajendra Vishnoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 32 of 2023
Decided On : 03-01-2023
Bail Application - Grant of Bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. - The court granted bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No.411/2021 for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of IPC. The petitioner preferred a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C, stating that the trial would take a long time to conclude.
Finding of the Court:
The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Issues: The main issue was whether the accused petitioner should be granted bail considering the nature of the offences and the time it would take for the trial to conclude.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and decided to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Final Decision: The bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. was allowed, and it was directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.411/2021 of Police Station Shastrinagar, District Jodhpur West, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offences are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
4. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Rajendra Vishnoi S/o Sukhram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.411/2021 of Police Station Shastrinagar, District Jodhpur West provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
Grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and the expected lengthy trial duration.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the trial is likely to be prolonged, and the accused is not a flight risk.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.