SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1078

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Rajendra Vishnoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhanwaru Ram, Advocate, Mukesh Trivedi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.411/2021 of Police Station Shastrinagar, District Jodhpur West, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offences are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Rajendra Vishnoi S/o Sukhram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.411/2021 of Police Station Shastrinagar, District Jodhpur West provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and sol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top