SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2729

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Mana Ram Danga – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2013 of 2022
Decided On : 06-12-2022

Important Points

The seriousness of the allegation against the appellant and the availability of other family members to attend the marriage were key factors influencing the court's decision to dismiss the appeal for interim bail.

Subject

Criminal Law - Bail Proceedings

Act Referred

INDIAN PENAL CODE : S.302
SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES ACT : S.14(a)(2)

Headnote

Interim Bail - SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 - The court dismissed the appeal for interim bail filed by the appellant under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, considering the seriousness of the allegation against the appellant and the availability of other family members to attend the marriage.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed a criminal appeal for interim bail citing the marriage of his cousin sister and brother as the ground for seeking bail.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the appeal for interim bail, considering the seriousness of the allegation against the appellant and the availability of other family members to attend the marriage.

Issues: The issue was whether the appellant should be granted interim bail for the marriage of his cousin sister and brother, despite facing allegations of committing murder.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the seriousness of the allegation against the appellant and the availability of other family members to attend the marriage as the basis for dismissing the appeal for interim bail.

Final Decision: The criminal appeal for interim bail was dismissed by the court.

Advocates Appeared:
G.R. Punia, Advocate, Rajesh Punia, Advocate, Dr. Sachin Acharya, Advocate, Rahul Rajpurohit, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present criminal appeal for interim bail has been filed by the appellant under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, on the ground of marriage of his cousin sister and brother on 07.12.2022 and 08.12.2022 respectively.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant’s cousin sister and brother marriage has been fixed on 07.12.2022 and 08.12.2022 respectively and presence of appellant is very much essential. In these circumstances, the appellant may be granted interim bail for a period of 15 days.

3. Dr. Sachin Acharya, learned Senior Advocate appearing for C.B.I. and learned Public Prosecutor have opposed the prayer of the appellant, since allegation against the appellant is for offence under Section 302 of IPC.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the CBI. Perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the facts that the allegation against the appellant is of committing murder of five persons and uncle whose children’s marriage is going to be solemnized, is not real uncle of the present appellant and there are other family members available in the family of the appellant to attend the marriage, this Court is not inclined to grant interim bail to the appellant.

6. Hence, the criminal appeal for interim bail is dismissed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top