SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2730

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Pema Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Narpat Ram, Advocate, Dr. Sachin Archarya, Advocate, Rahul Rajpurohit, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present criminal appeal (interim bail) under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities), Act has been filed by the appellant on the ground of engagement of appellant’s daughter.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that engagement of appellant’s daughter has been fixed on 07.12.2022 and being a father, presence of appellant is very much essential. In these circumstances, the presence of the appellant is very much essential in the marriage ceremony. It is prayed that the appellant may be granted interim bail for a period of 7 days.

3. Dr. Sachin Acharya, learned Senior Advocate appearing for C.B.I. and learned Public Prosecutor have opposed the prayer of the appellant, since allegation against the appellant is for offence under Section 302 of IPC.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the CBI. Perused the material available on record.

5. Taking into consideration the fact that engagement of appellant’s daughter has been fixed on 07.12.2022 and appellant’s presence is very much essential to perform his daughter’s function, I deem it ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top