IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Pema Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2014 of 2022
Decided On : 06-12-2022
Interim Bail - Engagement of Appellant's Daughter - The court granted interim bail to the appellant for three days to attend his daughter's engagement ceremony, subject to certain conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed a criminal appeal for interim bail to attend his daughter's engagement ceremony, citing the essential nature of his presence as a father.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant's presence at his daughter's engagement ceremony was essential and granted him interim bail for three days, subject to specified conditions.
Issues: The issue revolved around the appellant's request for interim bail to attend a family function while facing allegations under Section 302 of IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court balanced the essential nature of the appellant's presence at the family function with the seriousness of the allegations against him and granted interim bail for a limited period with specific conditions.
Final Decision: The court allowed the criminal appeal for interim bail and directed the appellant to be released for three days, subject to the specified conditions, and set a date for compliance of the order.
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present criminal appeal (interim bail) under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities), Act has been filed by the appellant on the ground of engagement of appellant’s daughter.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that engagement of appellant’s daughter has been fixed on 07.12.2022 and being a father, presence of appellant is very much essential. In these circumstances, the presence of the appellant is very much essential in the marriage ceremony. It is prayed that the appellant may be granted interim bail for a period of 7 days.
3. Dr. Sachin Acharya, learned Senior Advocate appearing for C.B.I. and learned Public Prosecutor have opposed the prayer of the appellant, since allegation against the appellant is for offence under Section 302 of IPC.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the CBI. Perused the material available on record.
5. Taking into consideration the fact that engagement of appellant’s daughter has been fixed on 07.12.2022 and appellant’s presence is very much essential to perform his daughter’s function, I deem it just and proper to release the appellant on interim bail for a period three days.
6. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal (interim bail) is allowed and it is directed that the appellant Pema Ram S/o Sh. Sugna Ram, shall be released on interim bail for a period of three (3) days in F.IR No.168/2015, P.S. Merta City, Distt. Nagaur subject to the condition that he shall deposit a demand draft of Rs.2,50,000/- of a Nationalized Bank executed in favour of the trial court and also furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.2,50,000/- (out of which one surety will be a close relative of the appellant) each to the satisfaction of learned trial court. The appellant shall surrender before the concerned jail authorities on 09.12.2022 at 4.30 P.M. It is made clear that if the appellant surrenders within the stipulated period then the demand draft of Rs.2,50,000/- will be returned to him. In case, the appellant fails to surrender before the concerned Jail after period of interim bail, the demand draft so deposited by the appellant shall be forfeited.
7. Let this criminal appeal be listed on 16.12.2022, on which date, learned Public Prosecutor shall be required to submit the compliance of the order whether appellant has been surrendered or not.
The court balanced the essential nature of the appellant's presence at a family function with the seriousness of the allegations against him in granting interim bail for a limited period with specifi....
The essential presence of the appellant in the mayra ceremony was a decisive factor in granting interim bail, balancing the allegations against him.
The court has the discretion to grant interim bail based on the specific circumstances, such as the essential presence of the appellant in a significant family event.
The court established that the grant of interim bail must consider the applicant's criminal history and the potential risk to public safety, even in light of personal hardships.
The presence of other competent family members to handle family obligations may be considered in deciding on applications for interim bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.