SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2804

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Mr. Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Smt. Lakshmi @ Pinki @ Khem Kawar – Appellant
Versus
Kiran Singh – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16565/2022
Decided On : 09-11-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rameshwar Lal Dave, for the Appellant; Mr. Jagdish Vyas Mr. Deepak Vyas, for the Respondent

The court has the discretion to waive the statutory period under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, based on the fulfillment of specific conditions as outlined by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh’s case (supra).

Headnote:

Waiver of Statutory Period - Hindu Marriage - Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - [Section 13-B(2)] - The court discussed the conditions set out by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh’s case (supra) and found that the parties had fulfilled these conditions. The court exercised its discretion and waived the statutory period of six months specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955, allowing the writ petition and setting aside the impugned order.

Fact of the Case:

The parties filed a joint application seeking divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. They also filed a joint application for waiver of the six months’ statutory period specified under Section 13-B(2), which was dismissed by the court below. The parties then filed a writ petition before the High Court, seeking waiver of the statutory period.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the conditions set out by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh’s case (supra) were fulfilled in the present case, and the parties, being educated and aware of their rights, had mutually decided to end their marriage with no hope of reconciliation. The court exercised its discretion and waived the statutory period of six months specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955, allowing the writ petition and setting aside the impugned order. The parties were directed to appear before the court below for the decree of divorce.

Issues: The main issue was whether the court should waive the statutory period of six months specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955, considering the circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the conditions set out by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh’s case (supra) to determine whether the statutory period should be waived. It found that the parties had fulfilled these conditions, and therefore, exercised its discretion to waive the statutory period.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the statutory period of six months specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955 was waived. The parties were directed to appear before the court below for the decree of divorce.

ORDER

1. This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 12.10.2022 passed by the Family Court No.3, Jodhpur (for short ’the court below’) in Hindu Marriage Case No.1005/2022, whereby the joint application filed by the petitioner and the respondent (hereinafter ’parties’) for waiver of six months period prescribed under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ’the Act of 1955) has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent Mr. Jagdish Vyas has submitted that the respondent is also aggrieved with the order impugned and this writ petition has been filed with the consent of the respondent. Mr. Vyas has submitted that he has no objection if the relief prayed for in this writ petition is granted.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the parties was solemnized as per Hindu customs on 08.05.2002 in District Jodhpur. It appears that after the marriage, the relations of the parties became strained and both of them have been residing separately since 2011.

3. Despite the best efforts of the parties to restore conjugal relations and in spite of regular counselling by their near relatives the matrimonial dispute between them could not be settled and therefore the parties jointly filed an application under Section 13-B of the Act of 1955 seeking divorce by mutual consent before the court below on 17.08.2022.

4. The court below registered the said application on 17.08.2022 and fixed the next date as 24.02.2023 for counselling of the parties.

5. In the meantime, the parties preferred a joint application on 28.09.2022, praying for waiver of six months’ statutory period specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955. Arguments on the said application were heard and the court below dismissed the said application vide its order dated 12.10.2022.

6. The judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur, reported in (2017) 8 SCC 746 was placed before the court below, however, the court below observed that since the facts of Amardeep Singh’s case (supra) are distinguishable from the facts of the present case and no extraordinary situation exists in the present case, the application seeking waiver of six months’ statutory period specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955 cannot be granted.

7. Being aggrieved with order dated 12.10.2022, the present writ petition has been preferred before this Court.

8. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that both, the petitioner and the respondent are educated persons and both of them have decided to end their marriage by mutual consent after due deliberations. It is also submitted that the decision by the parties to end their marriage has not been taken in a hurry and reconciliation between the parties is highly unlikely. It is further submitted that the conditions set out in Amardeep Singh’s case (supra) under which statutory period of six months, as specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955, can be waived are fulfilled in the present case and the court below has erred in refusing waiver of the six months’ statutory period.

9. The counsels for the parties have therefore prayed that the order impugned be set aside and the court below be directed to condone the waiver of the statutory period specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955.

10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

11. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh’s case (supra) has held as under :-

    "19. Applying the above to the present situation, we are of the view that where the Court dealing with a matter is satisfied that a case is made out to waive the statutory period under Section 13-B(2), it can do so after considering the following :

    i) the statutory period of six months specified in Section 13-B(2), in addition to the statutory period of one year under Section 13-B(1) of separation of parties is already over before the first motion itself;

    ii) all

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top