SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1494

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Smt. Priyanka – Appellant
Versus
Balveer Singh – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10195 of 2022
Decided On : 16-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Naresh Singh, for the Appellant
Mr. Tej Singh Badgujar, for the Respondent.

The period mentioned in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is not mandatory but directory, and the court has the discretion to waive the waiting period based on the facts and circumstances of each case.

Headnote:

Divorce - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13-B(2) - The court analyzed Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which specifies a six months' statutory period for divorce by mutual consent. The court considered the conditions for waiver of this period as set out in Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746. The court found that the period mentioned in Section 13-B(2) is not mandatory but directory, and the court has the discretion to waive the waiting period based on the facts and circumstances of each case.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner and respondent filed a joint application for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. They also filed an application for waiver of the six months' statutory period specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act. The court below dismissed the application for waiver. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the conditions set out by the Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746, which allow for the waiver of the statutory period. The court found that the conditions were fulfilled in the present case and granted the waiver of the six months' statutory period.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the period mentioned in Section 13-B(2) of the Act is not mandatory but directory. The court has the discretion to waive the waiting period based on the facts and circumstances of each case.

Result: The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order is set aside and the application for waiver of the statutory period is allowed. The parties are directed to appear before the court below for the decree of divorce.

ORDER

1. This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 20.05.2022 passed by the Family Court No.1, Jodhpur (for short 'the court below') in Suit No. 265/2022, whereby the joint application filed by the petitioner and the respondent (hereinafter 'parties') for waiver of six months period prescribed under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act of 1955') has been dismissed.

2. Mr. Tej Singh, learned counsel for the respondent, submitted that the respondent is also aggrieved with the order impugned and this writ petition has been filed with the consent of the respondent. Learned counsel submitted that he has no objection if the relief prayed for in this writ petition is granted.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the parties was solemnized as per Hindu customs on 17.02.2014 in Jodhpur. It appears that soon after the marriage, the relations of the parties became strained and both of them have been residing separately from last eight years.

4. Despite the best efforts of the parties to restore conjugal relations and in spite of regular counselling by their near relatives, the matrimonial dispute between them could not be settled and therefore the parties jointly filed an application under Section 13-B of the Act of 1955 seeking divorce by mutual consent before the court below on 15.03.2022.

5. The court below registered the said application and fixed the next date as 28.03.2022 for counselling of the parties.

6. In the meantime, the parties preferred a joint application praying for waiver of six months' statutory period specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955. Arguments on the said application were heard and the court below dismissed the said application vide its order dated 20.05.2022.

7. Being aggrieved with order dated 20.05.2022, the present writ petition has been preferred before this Court.

8. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that both, the petitioner and the respondent are highly educated persons and both of them have decided to end their marriage by mutual consent after due deliberations. It is also submitted that the decision by the parties to end their marriage has not been taken in a hurry and reconciliation between the parties is highly unlikely. It is further submitted that the conditions set out in the case of Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur, reported in (2017) 8 SCC 746, under which statutory period of six months, as specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955, can be waived are fulfilled in the present case and the court below has erred in refusing waiver of the six months' statutory period.

9. Learned counsel for the parties have therefore jointly prayed that the order impugned be set aside and the court below be directed to condone or waive the statutory period specified under Section 13-B(2) of the Act of 1955.

10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

11. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh's case (supra) has held as under :-

    '19. Applying the above to the present situation, we are of the view that where the Court dealing with a matter is satisfied that a case is made out to waive the statutory period under Section 13- B(2), it can do so after considering the following:

    i) the statutory period of six months specified in Section 13-B(2), in addition to the statutory period of one year under Section 13-B(1) of separation of parties is already over before the first motion itself;

    ii) all efforts for mediation/conciliation including efforts in terms of Order 32-A Rule 3 CPC/Section 23(2) of the Act/Section 9 of the Family Courts Act to reunite the parties have failed and there is no likelihood of success in that direction by any further efforts;

    iii) the parties have genuinely settled their differences including alimony, custody of child or any other pending issues between the parties;

    iv) the waiting period will only prolong their agony.

    The waiv

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top