SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1322

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Aarti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ashok – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ramesh Advocate.

ORDER :

Mr. Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 27.03.2024 passed by the Family Court No.1, Jodhpur (for short 'the court below') in Suit No. 232/2024, whereby the joint application filed by the petitioner and the respondent (hereinafter "parties") for waiver of six months period prescribed under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act of 1955') has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent, submitted that the respondent is also aggrieved with the order impugned and this writ petition has been filed with the consent of the respondent. Learned counsel submitted that he has no objection if the relief prayed for in this writ petition is granted.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the parties was solemnized as per Hindu customs on 10.06.2022 in Bikaner. It appears that soon after the marriage, the relations of the parties became strained and both of them have been residing separately from last twelve years.

4. Despite the best efforts of the parties to restore conjugal relations and in spite of regular counselling by their near relatives, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top