SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2860

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Dinesh Mehta, J.
Abhay Kumar Bharunt & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through PP – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6609/2022
Decided On : 13-10-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Kirti Pareek, for the Appellant; Mr. Mool Singh Bhati, P. P. Mr. Kaushal Gautam for the complainant, for the Respondent

The court can quash criminal proceedings based on compromise and settlement between the parties, even if the offences are non-compoundable, to establish peace and harmony.

Headnote:

Compounding - Criminal Proceedings - The court quashed the criminal proceedings pending before the trial court based on the compromise and settlement reached between the parties, even though the offences were not compoundable.

Fact of the Case:

The accused-petitioners sought to quash the criminal proceedings pending before the trial court for offences under Sections 498-A, 406, and 323 of IPC, citing a compromise and settlement between the parties.

Finding of the Court:

The court, considering the resolution of the dispute between the parties and their decision to live separately, quashed the criminal proceedings to establish peace and harmony between the parties, citing the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in similar cases.

Issues: The main issue was whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed based on the compromise and settlement between the parties, despite the offences being non-compoundable.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the principles established by the Supreme Court in similar cases, emphasizing the importance of establishing peace and harmony between the parties and allowing them to live peacefully in the future.

Final Decision: The criminal misc. petition was allowed, and the criminal proceedings pending before the trial court were quashed and set aside.

ORDER

1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the proceedings pending before the Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate, Bikaner in Criminal Case No.920/2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406 and 323 of IPC mainly on the ground that the parties have entered into compromise and amicably settled their dispute and now no dispute remains between them.

2. The brief facts are that on the First Information Report lodged by the complainant-respondent, after investigation chargesheet for the aforesaid offences was filed against the accusedpetitioners and on that basis above said criminal proceedings in Case No.920/2017 were initiated.

3. During the trial, both the parties filed an application under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. to permit compounding of the aforesaid offences.

4. The trial Court partly allowed the application and permitted to compound the offences under Sections 406 & 323 of IPC vide order dated 04.07.2018 but the prayer in respect of offence under Section 498-A IPC was refused, as the same is not compoundable.

5. In these circumstances, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of this petition to quash the aforesaid criminal proceedings pending before the trial Court on the ground that the parties have resolved their dispute.

6. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the complainant has no objection if the proceedings are quashed.

7. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal; considering that the petitioners and the complainant have resolved their dispute and the petitioner No.1 and the complainant (husband and wife respectively) have decided to live separately and in this regard an application under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act has been filed which too has been allowed vide order dated 04.07.2018, this Court is of the view that in order to establish peace and harmony between the petitioners and complainant and in order to let them live peacefully in the future life, it would be expedient that the impugned proceedings are quashed.

8. The present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by the Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the proceedings are liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties although the offences are not compoundable.

9. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the criminal proceedings pending before the Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate, Bikaner in Criminal Case No.920/2017 are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.

10. The stay application also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top