Chandan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2217

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2217

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Chandan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Chandan Singh
For the Respondents: Anil Joshi, Rajat Chhaparwal, Chhotu Singh

Table of Content
1. quashing of criminal proceedings is sought. (Para 1)
2. parties have entered into a compromise. (Para 2)
3. court considered previous judgments on compromise. (Para 3 , 4)
4. criminal proceedings can be quashed due to compromise. (Para 5 , 6)
5. conditions for quashing criminal proceedings. (Para 7 , 8)
6. fir and criminal proceedings are quashed. (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER :

1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner before the court of Additional Chief Judical Magistrate, Osiya in Criminal Case No. 269/2020 (State v. Shambhu Singh and ors.) arising out of FIR No. 90/2020, Police Station Kherapa, Jodhpur for offence under Sections 147 , 447, 427, 323 of IPC. Learned Magistrate vide order dated 30.01.2023 while partly allowing the application filed by the parties accept the compromise for offences under Sections 323 , 447, 427/149 but refused to compound the offence under Sections 147 , 148/149 IPC.

2. The complainant-respondent No. 2 has concurred the fact of compromise and submits that they have already entered into compromise and on the basis of it, there is no possibili

Click Here to Read the rest of this document