SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 3028

VIJAY BISHNOI
Harish Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Maksood Ahmed – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Mahendra Trivedi, for the Appellant; Mr. Rakesh Matoria, for the Respondent

ORDER

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 27.04.2022 passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer (for short ’the BoR’), whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. The revision petition was preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 12.10.2020 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Banswara (for short ’the SDO’), whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No.1 has moved an application before the SDO under Section 136 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (for short ’the Act of 1956’) with a prayer to make a fresh measurement with respect to the land of Khasra Nos.3089 and 6030/3088 of Village Talwada, Tehsil District Banswara.

3. The said application was opposed by the petitioner and a detailed reply to the same was filed by the petitioner.

4. During the pendency of the application under Section 136 of the Act of 1956, the petitioner has moved another application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC with a prayer that the application filed by the respondent No.1 under Section 136 of the Act of 1956 ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top