IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Rajendra Kumar Beniwal S/o Shri Shriram Beniwal - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department and ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14080, 14083, 14084, 14099, 14841, 14434, 15038, 17001, 17073, 17374, 17379, 17461, 17819, 17828, 18097, 18012, 13839, 14046, 14279, 14311, 14327, 14377, 14788, 14938, 14984, 14987, 15217, 15220, 15254, 15258, 16490, 16759, 17201, 17387, 17431, 17603, 4143, 4146, 4147, 4181 of 2023
Decided On : 16-11-2023
Bonus Marks - Recruitment Controversy - Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 - Rule 19 - The court discussed the controversy arising from the recruitment of various posts and the bone of contention regarding bonus marks and experience clauses. The court considered the constitutional validity of the provisions for selection on various posts and the process of selection involving assessment of merit. The court ordered that the selection and appointment, if any made, would be subject to the final outcome of the petitions except one. The court directed the State to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.
Fact of the Case:
The controversy arose from the recruitment of various posts and the bone of contention regarding bonus marks and experience clauses. The Division Bench of the Court considered the constitutional validity of the provisions for selection on various posts and the process of selection involving assessment of merit. The State was directed to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the selection and appointment, if any made, would be subject to the final outcome of the petitions except one. The State was directed to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.
Issues: The issues involved the constitutional validity of the provisions for selection on various posts, the process of selection involving assessment of merit, and the consideration of representations and grievances before publishing the final select list.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the need for the State to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.
Final Decision: The court ordered that the selection and appointment, if any made, would be subject to the final outcome of the petitions except one. The State was directed to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.
ORDER :
1. Since all the instant petitions involve a common controversy, though with marginal variation in the contextual facts, therefore, for the purposes of the present analogous adjudication, the facts and the prayer clauses are being taken from the above-numbered S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14080/2023 while treating the same as a lead case, rival submissions of the parties and the observations of the Court, in the present order, would also be based, particularly, on the factual matrix of the lead case.
1.1 The prayer clauses read as under:-
Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
Costs of the wit petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in these cases is emanating out of the recruitment to the various posts i.e. of Nursing and Paramedical Officer, Female Health Worker, Lab Technician and Dental Technician. Initially the recruitment was initiated by the State Government vide advertisement dated 16.11.2022 to be conducted in accordance with the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules of 1965’), but subsequently the advertisement was withdrawn and a fresh advertisement was issued on 05.05.2023 whereby the same recruitment was to be done under the Rules of 1965.
3. The bone of contention being the bonus marks to be given and not to be given arose and the experience clauses prompted the petitioners to come before this Court. The broader controversy was also laid before the Division Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in case of Bhanwar Kumar Bagaria & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5980/2022) alongwith other connected matters, in which, the interim order was not granted by Division Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench, but the protection of the selection process remaining subject to the final outcome of the writ petition was granted. The order dated 08.08.2023 reads as follows:
Except D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3471/2022, which is a PIL seeking direction for expeditious completion of selection process, all other petitions seek to challenge the constitutional validity of the provisions contained in respect of recruitment rules for appointment to the post of Pharmacist, Nursing Officer, Homeopathy Medical Officer & Ayurved Medical Officer.
A prayer has been made for staying operation of the rule and recruitment process for appointment to the post of Pharmacist, Nursing Officer, Homeopathy Medical Officer & A
Anzar Ahmad Versus State of Bihar and Others
Ashutosh Gupta Versus State of Rajasthan and Others
Dr. Dinesh Kumar and Others Versus Motilal Nehru Medical College, Allahabad and Others
Dr. Preeti Srivastava and Another Versus State of M.P. and Others
Forum for People’s Collective Efforts (FPCE) and Another Versus State of West Bengal and Another
Health for Millions Versus Union of India and Others
Kiran Gupta and Others Versus State of U.P. and Others
R. Chitralekha & Another Versus State of Mysore and Others
Ramjit Singh Kardam and Others Versus Sanjeev Kumar and Others
Ravindra Kumar Rai Versus State of Maharashtra and Others
Romesh Kumar Sharma Versus Union of India and Others
Shri Chander Chinar Bada Akhara Udasin Society and Others Versus State of J & K and Others
Srinivas K. Gouda Versus Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the selection process for the post of Ayurvedic Medical Officer must be in accordance with the prescribed procedure, fair-play, and justice, a....
Post of Police constable – Direct recruitment - To lower respective category-wise merit and accord selection to them on the vacant posts of Constable (Civil Police/PAC) – Held, Such situation eventua....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.