SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1180

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Rajendra Kumar Beniwal S/o Shri Shriram Beniwal - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department and ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14080, 14083, 14084, 14099, 14841, 14434, 15038, 17001, 17073, 17374, 17379, 17461, 17819, 17828, 18097, 18012, 13839, 14046, 14279, 14311, 14327, 14377, 14788, 14938, 14984, 14987, 15217, 15220, 15254, 15258, 16490, 16759, 17201, 17387, 17431, 17603, 4143, 4146, 4147, 4181 of 2023
Decided On : 16-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi a/w Mr. Jayram Saran, Mr. Rajeev Purohit a/w Mr. Shashank Joshi, Mr Manoj Bohra, Mr. Pawan Singh, Mr. V.L.S. Rajpurohit, on VC, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Rathore, Mr. Falgun Buch, Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla, Mr. Mahipal Charan a/w Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Mr. R.R. Ankiya a/w Mr. Bhima Ram, Mr. Chandan Singh Jodha, Mr. L.S. Udawat, Mr. Hardik Gautam for Mr. Rakesh Arora, Mr. Shreyash Ramdev,
For the Respondent:Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Advocate General, on VC assisted by Mr. Kartik Lodha, Mr. K.S. Rajpurohit, AAG assisted by Mr. Rajat Arora and Mr. Lucky Rajpurohit

Headnote:

Bonus Marks - Recruitment Controversy - Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 - Rule 19 - The court discussed the controversy arising from the recruitment of various posts and the bone of contention regarding bonus marks and experience clauses. The court considered the constitutional validity of the provisions for selection on various posts and the process of selection involving assessment of merit. The court ordered that the selection and appointment, if any made, would be subject to the final outcome of the petitions except one. The court directed the State to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.

Fact of the Case:

The controversy arose from the recruitment of various posts and the bone of contention regarding bonus marks and experience clauses. The Division Bench of the Court considered the constitutional validity of the provisions for selection on various posts and the process of selection involving assessment of merit. The State was directed to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the selection and appointment, if any made, would be subject to the final outcome of the petitions except one. The State was directed to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.

Issues: The issues involved the constitutional validity of the provisions for selection on various posts, the process of selection involving assessment of merit, and the consideration of representations and grievances before publishing the final select list.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the need for the State to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.

Final Decision: The court ordered that the selection and appointment, if any made, would be subject to the final outcome of the petitions except one. The State was directed to consider all representations and grievances before publishing the final select list, strictly adhere to Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965, and upload the decisions on the website.

ORDER :

1. Since all the instant petitions involve a common controversy, though with marginal variation in the contextual facts, therefore, for the purposes of the present analogous adjudication, the facts and the prayer clauses are being taken from the above-numbered S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14080/2023 while treating the same as a lead case, rival submissions of the parties and the observations of the Court, in the present order, would also be based, particularly, on the factual matrix of the lead case.

1.1 The prayer clauses read as under:-

    "It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed with cost and by and appropriate writ, order or directions; (i) the respondents may kindly be directed to award 10 bonus marks to the petitioner for the period for which he is working as GNM through Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society for more than one year in addition to 15 bonus marks which granted to the petitioner for the Covid period. (ii) the respondents may kindly be directed to grant total 25 bonus marks i.e. 15 bonus marks for In wake of onslaught of COVID- 19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court. period as GNM and 10 bonus marks for which petitioner working additionally one year through Rajasthan Medicare Relief society and (iii) the respondents may kindly be further directed after granting 25 bonus marks to the petitioner revised the list of documents verification which issued vide information dated 29.08.2023 (Annex. 11) and if petitioner stands in merit list then he called for documents verification and further if his name figured in the final merit list then he may be given appointment on the post of Nursing Officer in pursuance of the advertisement dated 05.05.2023 (Annex.8.).

Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.

Costs of the wit petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in these cases is emanating out of the recruitment to the various posts i.e. of Nursing and Paramedical Officer, Female Health Worker, Lab Technician and Dental Technician. Initially the recruitment was initiated by the State Government vide advertisement dated 16.11.2022 to be conducted in accordance with the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules of 1965’), but subsequently the advertisement was withdrawn and a fresh advertisement was issued on 05.05.2023 whereby the same recruitment was to be done under the Rules of 1965.

3. The bone of contention being the bonus marks to be given and not to be given arose and the experience clauses prompted the petitioners to come before this Court. The broader controversy was also laid before the Division Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in case of Bhanwar Kumar Bagaria & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5980/2022) alongwith other connected matters, in which, the interim order was not granted by Division Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench, but the protection of the selection process remaining subject to the final outcome of the writ petition was granted. The order dated 08.08.2023 reads as follows:

    “Heard.

Except D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3471/2022, which is a PIL seeking direction for expeditious completion of selection process, all other petitions seek to challenge the constitutional validity of the provisions contained in respect of recruitment rules for appointment to the post of Pharmacist, Nursing Officer, Homeopathy Medical Officer & Ayurved Medical Officer.

A prayer has been made for staying operation of the rule and recruitment process for appointment to the post of Pharmacist, Nursing Officer, Homeopathy Medical Officer & A

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top